--------UVA Back Traj README, Data Description--------- *Harvard Forest Back Trajectories* -------------------------------------- prepared by: Jennie L. Moody and J. Clay Davenport Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 phone (804) 924-0592 or 924-0569 FAX (804) 982-2300 --------------------------------------- The file enc.harvback.tar.Z contains back trajectories from the UVA Unix-modified version of the NOAA-HYSPLIT model developed by Roland Draxler. The calculations were run on an IBM RS/6000, the endpoint output files are standard ASCII files. The archive (tar) file is encoded with hfcrypt. The decryption key is available upon request from Dr. Moody at the address above. After decoding, it needs to be uncompressed and untarred on a UNIX machine (run "uncompress harvback.tar.Z|tar -xvf -"). These back trajectory files contain the modeled endpoints (latitude, longitude, pressure, height above terrain) at two hour time steps, going back 72 hours. Each file contains one quarter year of data (Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep, Oct-Dec) for all years from 1990, 1991, 1992 and 1993. File names are of the form hvtbYYXq.traj, where YY is the year and X is the quarter (i.e., hvtb901q.traj is the first quarter of 1990.) When there are gaps with missing trajectories, this is the result of completely missing meteorological grid files, ie., there was no input data on which to run the trajectory model. These are irrecoverable gaps. These trajectories are based on the relatively high resolution (90km grid, 1 hour time step) wind and temperature fields of the National Meteorological Center Nested Grid Model which was archived at a "thinned" resolution of every two hours, and every-other grid cell. Each trajectory was calculated to arrive near the top of the mixed-layer (the NGM modeled mixed layer, or boundary layer height). This value varies as a function of the time of day and depending on the meteorological situation. This provides a representative approach to defining the origin of air in the mixed layer over Harvard Forest. In addition, for a two year period, we also calculated back trajectories at a constant height of 500 meters above the surface. These lower-level trajectories are more likely to represent near-surface level winds, and therefore may be less representatvie of transport conditions, however, they are available upon request. The format of these trajectory files is as follows: There is 1 header line which describes the type of trajectories which follow, etc: format (a1, 2i3, f6.0, f6.0, a3) trajtype, segpertraj, hrsperseg, trajmissing, units of vertical coord. (meters or Pressure) definitions: trajtype: code to identify the trajectory model used (isetropic NMC trajectories or 3-D kinematic HYSPLIT trajectories based on the NGM; the latter are the only type available for Harvard forest) segpertraj: the total number of model time steps run (36 for Harvard Forest) hrsperseg: the number of hours per model time step (2 hours for Harvard Forst, therefore each trajectory models transport over the preceding 72 hours). trajmissing: the code employed for missing trajectory endpoint data (-999) vcord: units of vertical coordinate (obsolete; both are reported by HYSPLIT) Format for the rest of the data file: format(i8, f5.0, N (2f7.1,f6.0,f7.0)) N=segpertraj as defined above yymmddhh, theta, (lat(j), lon(j), pres(j), elev(j), j=1,segpertraj+1) note: the first lat lon pres reported are the coordinates of the trajectory starting point at Harvard Forest. Plots are available for each trajectory in a lat/lon map projection, with an additional panel showing the variation in pressure (which is a measure of the vertical motion of the parcel) included below the map. These plots will be available separately, with another README describing their aggregation into files. You will need to contact me (Jennie Moody) to obtain the encryption password for these files. In addition, I would prefer that you confer with me regarding the application of these data to any of your research. This will allow us both to determine that the data are not mis- interpreted. Finally, it is my expectation in posting these data that if they are used in any application of your own research, that the source of these calculations will be attributed in an acknowledgement, and that the NIGEC/DOE source of support be explicitly stated. ------------- Jennie Moody June 22, 1995